Wang Weiqing lawyers: 13816758013 graduated from East China University of Politics and Law, the current star on the law firm of Hainan, the main industry experience and agency cases: 
 In addition to its legal counsel the king lawyer involved in a case unit and provide a satisfactory legal services, but also successfully handled a range of civil, economic, criminal and administrative cases. 




 Disclaimer Standard Terms and reasonable provider should perform the prompt that obligation "to take other reasonable way to draw attention to the exclusion or limitation of its liability provisions, in accordance with the requirements of the other party, to explain the terms." Exemption form on reasonable terms The difficulty is how to identify the effectiveness of standard terms to understand provider "reasonable way" to fulfill the obligations and suggest that there is no obligation to fulfill it indicates that the effect of exemption clauses identified. 1 year revocation shall exercise the right, there is no clear creditor does not exercise the right of revocation in a year, elimination of the right to revoke it? If not eliminate, the one-year limitation period of another and similar to the textual representation of this uncertainty is the main cause for controversy lies. Therefore, in order to better identify the statute of limitations and the scheduled period, the legislation in the future, especially in the development of the Civil Code, it is necessary part of the relevant limitation period or the scheduled period, the text on a clear definition to avoid unnecessary disputes. Such as limitation, all the "right to request not to exercise because of ... ... weakened its effectiveness," or "statute of limitations for ... ... ... ... years," to express, while the scheduled period will be the "right ... ... ... ... After years of ... ... to destroy the "or" ... ... the right to be in the ... ... (if thousands of hours) after the exercise, otherwise ... ... the right to destroy. " This limitation can completely solve the confusion with the scheduled period of the problem. Space power system has been controversial in the academic form. Some scholars believe that space power and space utilization, including the right of ownership of space. Property rights and use of space, including the nature of the nature of space utilization and claims the right to use of space rights, property rights, including the nature of the space utilization of space on the ground and space easement right two, and claims the right to use nature of space, including space rental right and Space Borrowing powers of two. Some scholars believe that the right space and space utilization in addition to the right of ownership of space, but also including spatial Republic of China. I do not agree. The author believes that right should include space for ownership of space and space utilization rights, but there is no room for independent Republic of China. Because, as the neighboring right type of property not as a separate space adjacent to the neighboring right is only the space between the ownership or use rights in the exercise of the rights of ownership or right to limit or extension. Use of space, including the right of the right to space on the ground and space easement, it is only right, but not the nature of existence of the so-called claims the right to space utilization. The time of the contract is invalid so it is fault liability may arise. Avoidance of the contract of fault liability when there are three: (1) party fault caused by the time the contract is invalid fault liability, but when the parties to the contract illegal and invalid malicious collusion, fault liability does not apply because the parties to the contract null and void have deliberately fault, the law does not protect any of them. (2) the effectiveness of the pending contract is invalid due to not recognize the time of fault liability, such as the right to dispose of property disposes of other persons who entered into the contract is invalid without the right person when ratified by the negligence of the contracting responsibilities.